Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 21:05:20 +0900
sho@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
...
+ext4_ext_replace_branches(struct inode *org_inode, struct inode *dest_inode,
+ pgoff_t from_page, pgoff_t dest_from_page,
+ pgoff_t count_page, unsigned long *delete_start)
+{
+ struct ext4_ext_path *org_path = NULL;
+ struct ext4_ext_path *dest_path = NULL;
+ struct ext4_extent *oext, *dext;
+ struct ext4_extent tmp_ext;
+ int err = 0;
+ int depth;
+ unsigned long from, count, dest_off, diff, replaced_count = 0;
These should be sector_t, shouldn't they?
At some point should we start using blkcnt_t properly?
(block-in[-large]-file, not block-in[-large]-device?) I think that's
what it was introduced for, although it's not in wide use at this point.
I guess the type really isn't used anywhere else; just in the inode's
i_blocks. Hmm.
-Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
