Re: [RFC] [patch 2/3] i_version update for ext4: ext4 specific code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andreas Dilger a écrit :
On Jan 23, 2007  18:24 +0100, Cordenner jean noel wrote:
@@ -336,7 +336,7 @@
 #define i_size_high    i_dir_acl

 #if defined(__KERNEL__) || defined(__linux__)
-#define i_reserved1    osd1.linux1.l_i_reserved1
+#define ext4_i_version  osd1.linux1.l_i_version

This naming is inconsistent with other inode fields, what about
i_disk_version, like i_disk_size also used in the code?


I agree that sounds better
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux