Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] ext4 online defrag (ver 0.2)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Jan 19, 2007  14:19 +0900, Takashi Sato wrote:
> >>On Jan 16, 2007  21:03 +0900, sho@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >>>1. Add new ioctl(EXT4_IOC_DEFRAG) which returns the first physical
> >>>   block number of the specified file.  With this ioctl, a command
> >>>   gets the specified directory's.
> >>
> >>Maybe I don't understand, but how is this different from the long-time
> >>FIBMAP ioctl?
> >
> >I can use FIBMAP instead of my new ioctl.
> >You are right.  I should have used FIBMAP ioctl...
> 
> I have to get the physical block number of the specified directory.
> But FIBMAP is available only for a regular file, not for a directory.
> So I will use my new ioctl.

Though it might make sense to implement FIBMAP for a directory, to keep
it consistent and allow user-space tools like "filefrag" to work on
directories also.

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Principal Software Engineer
Cluster File Systems, Inc.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux