On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 02:42:51PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > I think ext3 is terminally crap by now. It still uses buffer heads in > places where it really really shouldn't, and as a result, things like > directory accesses are simply slower than they should be. Sadly, I don't > think ext4 is going to fix any of this, either. Not just ext3; ocfs2 is using the jbd layer as well. I think we're going to have to put this (a rework of jbd2 to use the page cache) on the ext4 todo list, and work with the ocfs2 folks to try to come up with something that suits their needs as well. Fortunately we have this filesystem/storage summit thing coming up in the next few months, and we can try to get some discussion going on the linux-ext4 mailing list in the meantime. Unfortunately, I don't think this is going to be trivial. If we do get this fixed for ext4, one interesting question is whether people would accept a patch to backport the fixes to ext3, given the the grief this is causing the page I/O and VM routines. OTOH, reiser3 probably has the same problems, and I suspect the changes to ext3 to cause it to avoid buffer heads, especially in order to support for filesystem blocksizes < pagesize, are going to be sufficiently risky in terms of introducing regressions to ext3 that they would probably be rejected on those grounds. So unfortunately, we probably are going to have to support flushes via buffer heads for the foreseeable future. - Ted - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html