Re: [RFC] Defragmentation interface

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On Nov 03, 2006  15:30 +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > - stripe unit and stripe width need to be exposed so defrag too
> > >   can make correct placement decisions.
> >   fs-specific thing...
> 
> I think this is not just XFS-specific.  It is very desirable to align
> large IO to the RAID stripe so that if you write stripe_width bytes
> you don't do 2 expensive read-modify-write steps, but rather a single
> write operation.  Also RAID controllers have (large) internal cache
> "lines" and having aligned reads can help noticably, and also if array
> is doing RAID parity checking to avoid overhead of doing this for two
> stripes instead of one.
  I see, thanks for information. On the other hand this is rather an
underlying block device feature than a fs thing, isn't it? So does it
make sence to pass this information via fs interface?

								Honza
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux