Re: a question about ext4_fsblk_t

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




   I also find many places where the block number type is not changed in namei.c and dir.c. Why? 
   Thank you to anyone who offer help
>Hello everyone:
>
>		I am a student interesting in linux filesystem, I have a problem about the replace of block number type to ext4_fsblk_t. Is it complete? Or has it passed all the test? Because I have found a place like this in linux-2.6.19-rc2/fs/ext4/inode.c 
>
>
>
>+struct buffer_head *ext4_bread(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
>+                               int block, int create, int *err)
>
>
>the block's type is not changed. Although I think it will bring no mistake, I doubt about why not change it. Thank you !
>
>
>guomingyang
>
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

guomingyang

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux