Re: [PATCH, E2FSPROGS] On-disk format definition for 64-bit support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 03:30:56PM +0200, Valerie Clement wrote:
>   Should 64-bit support also imply BIG_BG support?
> Yes. There is no flag added for the support of the big block groups, we 
> just use the INCOMPAT_64BIT flag.

But the Big BG code is not in the mainline kernel yet, and while the
64-bit code probably isn't getting used by anyone other than the ext4
developers, if it is going to be assumed by the BIG_BG code, we need
to get the Big BG format changes locked down and the Big BG code
merged into mainline ASAP.  If we can't get it done soon, we will need
to add a flag, since otherwise users will get confused about whether
or not thier kernel will support a filesystem that has big blockgroups
enabled.

						- Ted
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux