Re: Design alternatives for fragments/file tail support in ext4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> Theodore Tso (TT) writes:

 TT> I suggest this be tunable by superblock field, and not by a /proc
 TT> tunable.  This is the sort of thing which might be different
 TT> per-filesystem, and the algorithm will be most effective if the
 TT> filesystem always use the same cluster size from the time when it was
 TT> first created.  I'd be happy to assign a superblock field for this
 TT> purpose, and add the appropriate tune2fs support if we have general
 TT> agreement on this point.

that would be good. there is even a stride option to mke2fs?

thanks, Alex
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux