Re: Updated ext4/jbd2 patches based on 2.6.19-rc1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 08:55:26PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 13:23:30 -0500
> Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > I have rebuilt the ext4/jbd2 patches against linux-2.6.19-rc1.  The
> > patch set is located at
> > ftp://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/shaggy/ext4/2.6.19-rc1/ext4-patches-2.6.19-rc1.tar.gz
> > 
> 
> So let me see if I have this right.
> 
> You grab Alexandre's kit from http://www.bullopensource.org/ext4/20060926/
> and a plain old `mke2fs -j' gives a filesystem which will mount as ext3 or
> ext4.
> 
> If you then mount this filesystem with `-t ext4dev -o extents', it becomes
> incompatible with the ext3 driver.  Yes?

I agree that's the wrong behaviour, and I've always hated the idea of
using using mount -o options to enable ext3/4 features.  (When do it
with EA's and acl's, sigh, and that's wrong too, but at least I was
able to paper over that later by adding default mount option support
into the superblock.)

The right way to do this is to only enable a feature like extents
after using tune2fs -O extents, or creating a filesystem with mke2fs
-O extents.

Can we change the patches to do this, please?

						- Ted
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux