Re: Bug#389772: e2fsprogs: e2fsck produces broken htree on ppc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 02:22:51PM +0200, Jörg Sommer wrote:
> Package: e2fsprogs
> Version: 1.39-1
> Severity: important
> 
> you set the compiler option -fsigned-char, but on PowerPC the default is
> unsigned char. This makes the kernel uses unsigned and e2fsck uses signed
> chars.
> 
> In the case of an 8 bit character, str2hashbuf() in lib/ext2fs/dirhash.c
> produces a different buf than the kernel, which leads to the problem that
> the hash calculated by TEA_transform() is a different one.

Oh, dear.  This is actually a kernel bug, because the on all other
platforms, the TEA hash will be using a signed char --- and if you
want filesystems to be portable between different systems (hint: we
do), then all architectures should be using the same algorithm.  And
the vast majority of the systems out there are using signed chars.
Unfortunately PowerPC decided to be different.  :-(

Fixing this is going to be painful, because if we fix the kernel to
suddenly use signed chars in the TEA algorithm, like all other right
thinking architectures (joke! joke!), then existing ext3 filesystems
with directory hashing enabled will break.

But given that e2fsck is doing it right, and the kernel is doing it
wrong, we have the mismatch already.  Sigh, this is going to be
especially painful, given that all the major distributions (SLES,
RHEL, Debian, Ubuntu, etc.) are now shipping with directory hashing
enabled by default, and so this is going to impact a huge number of
PowerPC Linux users and customers.

OK, I think how are going to have to fix this is to define two new
flags in the superblock, which indicates whether str2hashbuf is using
signed or unsigned chars.  If neither flag is set, then new kernels
and new e2fsprogs will set the flag for the "native" signed/unsigned
char convention, and assume that it is correct.  I think this is only
a PowerPC problem, but we'll probably need to do a quick check of all
of the other architectures.

Paul, since you're the PowerPC maintainer, I figured I'd better cc
you.  Does this sound sane to you?

							- Ted
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux