On Fri, 02 Feb 2024 08:21:01 +0100 Tobias Waldekranz wrote: > My idea now is to get the fix accepted, wait for the next merge of net > back to net-next, then fixup this series so that it does not reintroduce > the MDB sync issue. I already have a version of the fix that applies on > top of this series, so I'll just work it in to the switchdev refactor > steps in the next version. > > Is there a better way to go about this? No no, that's perfect! This set was still active in patchwork yesterday, tho, so we could have applied it by mistake.. If you realize there's a conflict it's worth sending a comment to the already-posted net-next series notifying maintainers of the situation.
