On ons, jan 31, 2024 at 13:50, Jiri Pirko <jiri@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 01:35:43PM CET, tobias@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >>When adding/removing a port to/from a bridge, the port must be brought >>up to speed with the current state of the bridge. This is done by >>replaying all relevant events, directly to the port in question. > > Could you please use the imperative mood in your patch descriptions? > That way, it is much easier to understand what is the current state of > things and what you are actually changing. > > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v6.7/process/submitting-patches.html#describe-your-changes > > While at it, could you also fix your cover letter so the reader can > actually tell what's the current state and what the patchset is doing? Sure thing. Do you feel that this is enough of an issue that it blocks you from doing a review of v1, or can I wait for more feedback and bake it in with other changes?
