Re: [PATCH net-next v2 6/8] mlxsw: spectrum_flower: Do not force matching on iif

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 29/05/2023 14:48, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> Currently, mlxsw only supports the 'ingress_ifindex' field in the
> 'FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_META' key, but subsequent patches are going to add
> support for the 'l2_miss' field as well. It is valid to only match on
> 'l2_miss' without 'ingress_ifindex', so do not force matching on it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> 
> Notes:
>     v2:
>     * New patch.
> 
>  drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_flower.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_flower.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_flower.c
> index 2b0bae847eb9..9c62c12e410b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_flower.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_flower.c
> @@ -290,6 +290,9 @@ mlxsw_sp_flower_parse_meta_iif(struct mlxsw_sp_acl_rule_info *rulei,
>  	struct mlxsw_sp_port *mlxsw_sp_port;
>  	struct net_device *ingress_dev;
>  
> +	if (!match->mask->ingress_ifindex)
> +		return 0;
> +
>  	if (match->mask->ingress_ifindex != 0xFFFFFFFF) {
>  		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Unsupported ingress ifindex mask");
>  		return -EINVAL;


Reviewed-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>




[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [AoE Tools]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]

  Powered by Linux