On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 01:47:47PM +0300, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote: > Having the current count is just a helper, if you have a high limit dumping the table > and counting might take awhile. Thanks for the feedback, then we'll polish and move > on with the set for a global limit. Ok, but to be useful, the current count will have to be directly comparable to the limit, I guess. So the current count will also be for dynamically learned entries? Or is the plan to enforce the global limit for any kind of FDB entries?
