Re: [PATCH net-next 3/4] bridge: mcast: Move validation to a policy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 07:20:57PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu,  9 Feb 2023 09:18:51 +0200 Ido Schimmel wrote:
> > +	if (nla_len(attr) != sizeof(struct br_mdb_entry)) {
> > +		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Invalid MDBA_SET_ENTRY attribute length");
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> 
> Well, you're just moving it, but NL_SET_ERR_MSG_ATTR() would be better.
> We shouldn't be adding _MOD() in the core implementation of the family.

Assuming you are referring to this code when it's moved to
net/core/rtnetlink.c, then I already removed the _MOD() suffix from it
(as visible in the RFC). I can squash this as well:

diff --git a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
index c9f878a28d32..491e4231b3dd 100644
--- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
+++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
@@ -6138,7 +6138,7 @@ static int rtnl_validate_mdb_entry(const struct nlattr *attr,
        struct br_mdb_entry *entry = nla_data(attr);
 
        if (nla_len(attr) != sizeof(struct br_mdb_entry)) {
-               NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Invalid MDBA_SET_ENTRY attribute length");
+               NL_SET_ERR_MSG_ATTR(extack, attr, "Invalid attribute length");
                return -EINVAL;
        }



[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [AoE Tools]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]

  Powered by Linux