On 01/11/2022 21:39, Ido Schimmel wrote: > From: "Hans J. Schultz" <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Hosts that support 802.1X authentication are able to authenticate > themselves by exchanging EAPOL frames with an authenticator (Ethernet > bridge, in this case) and an authentication server. Access to the > network is only granted by the authenticator to successfully > authenticated hosts. > > The above is implemented in the bridge using the "locked" bridge port > option. When enabled, link-local frames (e.g., EAPOL) can be locally > received by the bridge, but all other frames are dropped unless the host > is authenticated. That is, unless the user space control plane installed > an FDB entry according to which the source address of the frame is > located behind the locked ingress port. The entry can be dynamic, in > which case learning needs to be enabled so that the entry will be > refreshed by incoming traffic. > > There are deployments in which not all the devices connected to the > authenticator (the bridge) support 802.1X. Such devices can include > printers and cameras. One option to support such deployments is to > unlock the bridge ports connecting these devices, but a slightly more > secure option is to use MAB. When MAB is enabled, the MAC address of the > connected device is used as the user name and password for the > authentication. > > For MAB to work, the user space control plane needs to be notified about > MAC addresses that are trying to gain access so that they will be > compared against an allow list. This can be implemented via the regular > learning process with the sole difference that learned FDB entries are > installed with a new "locked" flag indicating that the entry cannot be > used to authenticate the device. The flag cannot be set by user space, > but user space can clear the flag by replacing the entry, thereby > authenticating the device. > > Locked FDB entries implement the following semantics with regards to > roaming, aging and forwarding: > > 1. Roaming: Locked FDB entries can roam to unlocked (authorized) ports, > in which case the "locked" flag is cleared. FDB entries cannot roam > to locked ports regardless of MAB being enabled or not. Therefore, > locked FDB entries are only created if an FDB entry with the given {MAC, > VID} does not already exist. This behavior prevents unauthenticated > devices from disrupting traffic destined to already authenticated > devices. > > 2. Aging: Locked FDB entries age and refresh by incoming traffic like > regular entries. > > 3. Forwarding: Locked FDB entries forward traffic like regular entries. > If user space detects an unauthorized MAC behind a locked port and > wishes to prevent traffic with this MAC DA from reaching the host, it > can do so using tc or a different mechanism. > > Enable the above behavior using a new bridge port option called "mab". > It can only be enabled on a bridge port that is both locked and has > learning enabled. Locked FDB entries are flushed from the port once MAB > is disabled. A new option is added because there are pure 802.1X > deployments that are not interested in notifications about locked FDB > entries. > > Signed-off-by: Hans J. Schultz <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > > Notes: > v1: > * Extend commit message. > * Adjust extack message. > * Flush locked FDB entries when MAB is disabled. > * Refresh locked FDB entries. > * Add comments in br_handle_frame_finish(). > > Changes made by me: > * Reword commit message. > * Reword comment regarding 'NTF_EXT_LOCKED'. > * Use extack in br_fdb_add(). > * Forbid MAB when learning is disabled. > > include/linux/if_bridge.h | 1 + > include/uapi/linux/if_link.h | 1 + > include/uapi/linux/neighbour.h | 8 +++++++- > net/bridge/br_fdb.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ > net/bridge/br_input.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++-- > net/bridge/br_netlink.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++- > net/bridge/br_private.h | 3 ++- > net/core/rtnetlink.c | 5 +++++ > 8 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > Acked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>