Re: [PATCH v8 net-next 02/12] net: bridge: add blackhole fdb entry flag

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2022-10-20 15:06, Ido Schimmel wrote:

[...]

@@ -1140,7 +1148,7 @@ static int __br_fdb_add(struct ndmsg *ndm, struct net_bridge *br,
 		err = br_fdb_external_learn_add(br, p, addr, vid, true);
 	} else {
 		spin_lock_bh(&br->hash_lock);
-		err = fdb_add_entry(br, p, addr, ndm, nlh_flags, vid, nfea_tb);
+ err = fdb_add_entry(br, p, addr, ndm, nlh_flags, vid, ext_flags, nfea_tb);

I believe the preference is to wrap to 80 columns when possible.

Very strange... since I ran checkpatch.pl from the net-next kernel itself and it did not give me any warnings about 80 columns, but rather said 'patch is ready for submission'.

As this is silent, could it be some missing python plugins or something to do with perl?



[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [AoE Tools]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]

  Powered by Linux