On 2022-09-23 13:34, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On 2022-09-21 09:15, Ido Schimmel wrote:
# Check blackhole entries can be replaced.
bridge fdb replace `mac_get $h2` dev $swp2 master static
bridge fdb get `mac_get $h2` br br0 | grep -q blackhole
check_fail $? "Blackhole entry found after replacement"
There seems to be a problem with replacing blackhole fdb entries as
fdb_find_rcu() does not find the associated fdb entry (addr, vid) and
I don't know why that is the case?
I realize that the reason why fdb_find_rcu() does not find the entry is
surely that it is stored in the bridge device fdb and not 'master' fdb.
