> I like Andrew's patch because it is the Rx equivalent of > br_switchdev_frame_unmark() in br_dev_xmit(). However, if we go with the > second option, it should allow us to remove the clearing of the mark in > the Tx path as the control block is cleared in the Tx path since commit > fd65e5a95d08 ("net: bridge: clear bridge's private skb space on xmit"). > > I don't know how far back Nik's patch was backported and I don't know > how far back Andrew's patch will be backported, so it might be best to > submit Andrew's patch to net as-is and then in net-next change > nbp_switchdev_allowed_egress() and remove br_switchdev_frame_unmark() > from both the Rx and Tx paths. > > Anyway, I have applied this patch to our tree for testing. Will report > tomorrow in case there are any regressions. Hi Ido Did your testing find any issues? Thanks Andrew