On tor, mar 10, 2022 at 16:18, Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 10/03/2022 15:36, Hans Schultz wrote: >> This patch set extends the locked port feature for devices >> that are behind a locked port, but do not have the ability to >> authorize themselves as a supplicant using IEEE 802.1X. >> Such devices can be printers, meters or anything related to >> fixed installations. Instead of 802.1X authorization, devices >> can get access based on their MAC addresses being whitelisted. >> >> For an authorization daemon to detect that a device is trying >> to get access through a locked port, the bridge will add the >> MAC address of the device to the FDB with a locked flag to it. >> Thus the authorization daemon can catch the FDB add event and >> check if the MAC address is in the whitelist and if so replace >> the FDB entry without the locked flag enabled, and thus open >> the port for the device. >> >> This feature is known as MAC-Auth or MAC Authentication Bypass >> (MAB) in Cisco terminology, where the full MAB concept involves >> additional Cisco infrastructure for authorization. There is no >> real authentication process, as the MAC address of the device >> is the only input the authorization daemon, in the general >> case, has to base the decision if to unlock the port or not. >> >> With this patch set, an implementation of the offloaded case is >> supplied for the mv88e6xxx driver. When a packet ingresses on >> a locked port, an ATU miss violation event will occur. When >> handling such ATU miss violation interrupts, the MAC address of >> the device is added to the FDB with a zero destination port >> vector (DPV) and the MAC address is communicated through the >> switchdev layer to the bridge, so that a FDB entry with the >> locked flag enabled can be added. >> >> Hans Schultz (3): >> net: bridge: add fdb flag to extent locked port feature >> net: switchdev: add support for offloading of fdb locked flag >> net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: mac-auth/MAB implementation >> >> drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/Makefile | 1 + >> drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c | 10 +-- >> drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.h | 5 ++ >> drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/global1.h | 1 + >> drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/global1_atu.c | 29 +++++++- >> .../net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/mv88e6xxx_switchdev.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++ >> .../net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/mv88e6xxx_switchdev.h | 20 ++++++ >> drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/port.c | 11 +++ >> drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/port.h | 1 + >> include/net/switchdev.h | 3 +- >> include/uapi/linux/neighbour.h | 1 + >> net/bridge/br.c | 3 +- >> net/bridge/br_fdb.c | 13 +++- >> net/bridge/br_input.c | 11 ++- >> net/bridge/br_private.h | 5 +- >> 15 files changed, 167 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) >> create mode 100644 drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/mv88e6xxx_switchdev.c >> create mode 100644 drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/mv88e6xxx_switchdev.h >> > > This doesn't look like an iproute2 patch-set. I think you've messed the target > in the subject. Sorry, complete bummer! I have resent it with the correct header.
