On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 12:49:17PM +0300, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote: > Nacked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@xxxxxxxxxx> > > I think we just discussed this a day ago? It is the same problem - > while we all agree the values should follow the RFC, users have had > the option to set any values forever (even non-RFC compliant ones). > This change risks breaking user-space. OK, I misunderstood your reply in last mail. I thought you only object to disabling no meaning values(e.g. set timer to 0, which not is forbid by the RFC). I don't know you also reject to follow a *MUST* rule defined in the RFC. > > Users are free to follow the RFC or not, we can't force them at this > point. This should've been done when the config option was added long > time ago. OK, I will stop working on this path. Thanks Hangbin
