Bridge port isolation offload

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@xxxxxxxxxx>, Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@xxxxxxxxxx>, David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>, bridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@xxxxxxxxx>, Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Bridge port isolation offload
From: DENG Qingfang <dqfext@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 12:40:49 +0800

Hi,

Bridge port isolation flag (BR_ISOLATED) was added in commit
7d850abd5f4e. But switchdev does not offload it currently.
It should be easy to implement in drivers, just like bridge offload
but prevent isolated ports to communicate with each other.

Your thoughts?

Regards,
  Qingfang

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bridge port isolation offload
  - From: Vladimir Oltean
- Re: Bridge port isolation offload
  - From: Florian Fainelli

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH net] net: bridge: validate the NUD_PERMANENT bit when adding an extern_learn FDB entry
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH net] net: bridge: validate the NUD_PERMANENT bit when adding an extern_learn FDB entry
Previous by thread: Re: [syzbot] possible deadlock in br_ioctl_call
Next by thread: Re: Bridge port isolation offload
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Netdev] [AoE Tools] [Linux Wireless] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Linux for Hams] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux RAID] [Linux Admin] [Samba] [Video 4 Linux]

Powered by Linux