July 29, 2021 12:18 AM, "Pablo Neira Ayuso" <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 11:57:02AM +0800, Yajun Deng wrote:
>
>> It should be added kfree_skb_list() when err is not equal to zero
>> in nf_br_ip_fragment().
>>
>> Fixes: 3c171f496ef5 ("netfilter: bridge: add connection tracking system")
>> Signed-off-by: Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> net/bridge/netfilter/nf_conntrack_bridge.c | 12 ++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/bridge/netfilter/nf_conntrack_bridge.c
>> b/net/bridge/netfilter/nf_conntrack_bridge.c
>> index 8d033a75a766..059f53903eda 100644
>> --- a/net/bridge/netfilter/nf_conntrack_bridge.c
>> +++ b/net/bridge/netfilter/nf_conntrack_bridge.c
>> @@ -83,12 +83,16 @@ static int nf_br_ip_fragment(struct net *net, struct sock *sk,
>>
>> skb->tstamp = tstamp;
>> err = output(net, sk, data, skb);
>> - if (err || !iter.frag)
>> - break;
>> -
>> + if (err) {
>> + kfree_skb_list(iter.frag);
>> + return err;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!iter.frag)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> skb = ip_fraglist_next(&iter);
>> }
>> - return err;
>
> Why removing this line above? It enters slow_path: on success.
>
I used return rather than break, it wouldn't enter the slow_path.
> This patch instead will keep this aligned with IPv6.
>
I think err and !iter.frag are not related, there is no need to put them in an if statement,
We still need to separate them after loop. So I separate them in loop and use return instead
of break. In addition, if you insist, I will accept your patch.
>> }
>> slow_path:
>> /* This is a linearized skbuff, the original geometry is lost for us.
>> --
>> 2.32.0
