On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 05:01:48PM +0300, Ido Schimmel wrote: > > The patches were split from a larger series for easier review: > > This is not what I meant. I specifically suggested to get the TX > forwarding offload first and then extending the API with an argument to > opt-in for the replay / cleanup: Yeah, ok, I did not get that and I had already reposted by the time you clarified, sorry. Anyway, is it so bad that we cannot look at the patches in the order that they are in right now (even if this means that maybe a few more days would pass)? To me it makes a bit more sense anyway to first consolidate the code that is already in the tree right now, before adding new logic. And I don't really want to rebase the patches again to change the ordering and risk a build breakage without a good reason.
