On 2021/3/9 19:01, Florian Westphal wrote:
Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
When find_table_lock() returns NULL to t, no error return code of
do_update_counters() is assigned.
Its -ENOENT.
t = find_table_lock(net, name, &ret, &ebt_mutex);
^^^^^
ret is passed to find_table_lock, which passes it to
find_inlist_lock_noload() which will set *ret = -ENOENT
for NULL case.
Thanks for the reply!
I did not notice "&ret" in find_table_lock()...
I am sorry for the false positive.
Best wishes,
Jia-Ju Bai