On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 11:12:26 +0200 Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote: > On 28/01/2021 03:42, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Tue, 26 Jan 2021 11:35:31 +0200 Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote: > >> From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> Hi, > >> This set adds a simple configurable per-port EHT tracked hosts limit. > >> Patch 01 adds a default limit of 512 tracked hosts per-port, since the EHT > >> changes are still only in net-next that shouldn't be a problem. Then > >> patch 02 adds the ability to configure and retrieve the hosts limit > >> and to retrieve the current number of tracked hosts per port. > >> Let's be on the safe side and limit the number of tracked hosts by > >> default while allowing the user to increase that limit if needed. > > > > Applied, thanks! > > > > I'm curious that you add those per-port sysfs files, is this a matter > > of policy for the bridge? Seems a bit like a waste of memory at this > > point. > > Indeed, that's how historically new port and bridge options are added. > They're all exposed via sysfs. I wonder if we should just draw the line > and continue with netlink-only attributes. Perhaps we should add a comment > about it for anyone adding new ones. > > Since this is in net-next I can send a follow up to drop the sysfs part > and another to add that comment. > > WDYT? SGTM!
