Hi Horatiu, On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 at 14:34, Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The 06/23/2020 14:38, David Miller wrote: > > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe > > > > From: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 11:05:39 +0200 > > > > > This patch series does the following: > > > - fixes the enum br_mrp_port_role_type. It removes the port role none(0x2) > > > because this is in conflict with the standard. The standard defines the > > > interconnect port role as value 0x2. > > > - adds checks regarding current defined port roles: primary(0x0) and > > > secondary(0x1). > > > > > > v2: > > > - add the validation code when setting the port role. > > > > Series applied, thank you. > > Thanks. Will these patches be applied also on net-next? > Because if I start now to add support for the interconnect port, these > patches are needed on net-next. Or do I need to add these patches to the > patch series for the interconnect port? > What is the correct way of doing this? > > -- > /Horatiu The "net" tree is merged weekly (or so) by David into "net-next". So, your patches should be available at the beginning of the next week. Cheers, -Vladimir