Re: [PATCH net-next] bridge: mrp: Extend MRP netlink interface with IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_CLEAR

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 24/06/2020 11:05, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> In case the userspace daemon dies, then when is restarted it doesn't
> know if there are any MRP instances in the kernel. Therefore extend the
> netlink interface to allow the daemon to clear all MRP instances when is
> started.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  include/uapi/linux/if_bridge.h |  8 ++++++++
>  net/bridge/br_mrp.c            | 15 +++++++++++++++
>  net/bridge/br_mrp_netlink.c    | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  net/bridge/br_private_mrp.h    |  1 +
>  4 files changed, 50 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/if_bridge.h b/include/uapi/linux/if_bridge.h
> index caa6914a3e53a..2ae7d0c0d46b8 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/if_bridge.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/if_bridge.h
> @@ -166,6 +166,7 @@ enum {
>  	IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_RING_STATE,
>  	IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_RING_ROLE,
>  	IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_START_TEST,
> +	IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_CLEAR,
>  	__IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_MAX,
>  };
>  
> @@ -228,6 +229,13 @@ enum {
>  
>  #define IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_START_TEST_MAX (__IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_START_TEST_MAX - 1)
>  
> +enum {
> +	IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_CLEAR_UNSPEC,
> +	__IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_CLEAR_MAX,
> +};

Out of curiousity - do you plan to have any clean attributes?
In case you don't this can simply be a flag that clears the MRP instances instead
of a nested attribute.

> +
> +#define IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_CLEAR_MAX (__IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_CLEAR_MAX - 1)
> +
>  struct br_mrp_instance {
>  	__u32 ring_id;
>  	__u32 p_ifindex;
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_mrp.c b/net/bridge/br_mrp.c
> index 24986ec7d38cc..02d102edaaaad 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_mrp.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_mrp.c
> @@ -372,6 +372,21 @@ int br_mrp_del(struct net_bridge *br, struct br_mrp_instance *instance)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +/* Deletes all MRP instances on the bridge
> + * note: called under rtnl_lock
> + */
> +int br_mrp_clear(struct net_bridge *br)
> +{
> +	struct br_mrp *mrp;
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry_rcu(mrp, &br->mrp_list, list,
> +				lockdep_rtnl_is_held()) {
> +		br_mrp_del_impl(br, mrp);

I don't think you're in RCU-protected region here, as the lockdep above confirms, which
means br_mrp_del_impl() can free mrp and you can access freed memory while walking the list
(trying to access of the next element).

You should be using list_for_each_entry_safe() to delete elements while walking the list.

Cheers,
 Nik

> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  /* Set port state, port state can be forwarding, blocked or disabled
>   * note: already called with rtnl_lock
>   */
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_mrp_netlink.c b/net/bridge/br_mrp_netlink.c
> index 34b3a8776991f..5e743538464f6 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_mrp_netlink.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_mrp_netlink.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ static const struct nla_policy br_mrp_policy[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_MAX + 1] = {
>  	[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_RING_STATE]	= { .type = NLA_NESTED },
>  	[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_RING_ROLE]	= { .type = NLA_NESTED },
>  	[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_START_TEST]	= { .type = NLA_NESTED },
> +	[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_CLEAR]		= { .type = NLA_NESTED },
>  };
>  
>  static const struct nla_policy
> @@ -235,6 +236,25 @@ static int br_mrp_start_test_parse(struct net_bridge *br, struct nlattr *attr,
>  	return br_mrp_start_test(br, &test);
>  }
>  
> +static const struct nla_policy
> +br_mrp_clear_policy[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_CLEAR_MAX + 1] = {
> +	[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_CLEAR_UNSPEC]		= { .type = NLA_REJECT },
> +};
> +
> +static int br_mrp_clear_parse(struct net_bridge *br, struct nlattr *attr,
> +			      struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> +{
> +	struct nlattr *tb[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_START_TEST_MAX + 1];
> +	int err;
> +
> +	err = nla_parse_nested(tb, IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_CLEAR_MAX, attr,
> +			       br_mrp_clear_policy, extack);
> +	if (err)
> +		return err;
> +
> +	return br_mrp_clear(br);
> +}
> +
>  int br_mrp_parse(struct net_bridge *br, struct net_bridge_port *p,
>  		 struct nlattr *attr, int cmd, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>  {
> @@ -301,6 +321,12 @@ int br_mrp_parse(struct net_bridge *br, struct net_bridge_port *p,
>  			return err;
>  	}
>  
> +	if (tb[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_CLEAR]) {
> +		err = br_mrp_clear_parse(br, tb[IFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_CLEAR], extack);
> +		if (err)
> +			return err;
> +	}
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_private_mrp.h b/net/bridge/br_private_mrp.h
> index 33b255e38ffec..25c3b8596c25b 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_private_mrp.h
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_private_mrp.h
> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ struct br_mrp {
>  /* br_mrp.c */
>  int br_mrp_add(struct net_bridge *br, struct br_mrp_instance *instance);
>  int br_mrp_del(struct net_bridge *br, struct br_mrp_instance *instance);
> +int br_mrp_clear(struct net_bridge *br);
>  int br_mrp_set_port_state(struct net_bridge_port *p,
>  			  enum br_mrp_port_state_type state);
>  int br_mrp_set_port_role(struct net_bridge_port *p,
> 




[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [AoE Tools]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]

  Powered by Linux