On 04/04/2019 15:21, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 03:02:19PM +0300, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote: >> On 04/04/2019 14:56, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: >>> Simplify this code by updating bridge multicast stats from >>> maybe_deliver(). >>> >>> Note that commit 6db6f0eae605 ("bridge: multicast to unicast"), in case >>> the port flag BR_MULTICAST_TO_UNICAST is set, never updates the previous >>> port pointer, therefore it is always going to be different from the >>> existing port in this deduplicated list iteration. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> net/bridge/br_forward.c | 15 ++++----------- >>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > This is removing two branches, it is less code to maintain and easier > to read than: > > if (prev == p) > ack >> This was intentional, the reason I didn't add that call to maybe_deliver() is to avoid >> these checks for the standard unicast fast-path. We need to avoid touching the mcast >> cache lines (and checks) when using unicast. > > maybe_deliver() is called from br_flood() and br_multicast_flood(), > not the standard unicast fast-path. > Oh right, I was thinking of should_deliver(), my bad. > Thanks. > Acked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>