Re: [PATCH net-next 01/12] vxlan: Add a function to init switchdev_notifier_vxlan_fdb_info

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2018 15:50:23 +0000

> +static struct switchdev_notifier_vxlan_fdb_info
> +vxlan_fdb_switchdev_notifier_info(const struct vxlan_dev *vxlan,
> +				  const struct vxlan_fdb *fdb,
> +				  const struct vxlan_rdst *rd)
> +{
> +	struct switchdev_notifier_vxlan_fdb_info fdb_info = {
> +		.info.dev = vxlan->dev,
> +		.remote_ip = rd->remote_ip,
> +		.remote_port = rd->remote_port,
> +		.remote_vni = rd->remote_vni,
> +		.remote_ifindex = rd->remote_ifindex,
> +		.vni = fdb->vni,
> +		.offloaded = rd->offloaded,
> +		.added_by_user = fdb->flags & NTF_VXLAN_ADDED_BY_USER,
> +	};
> +
> +	memcpy(fdb_info.eth_addr, fdb->eth_addr, ETH_ALEN);
> +	return fdb_info;
> +}

Never return a structure by value from a function.  Do you have any idea
how the compiler implement this?

In the one call site in vxlan.c after this patch is applied, _two_
switchdev_notifier_cxlan_fdb_info objects are allocated on the stack.

vxlan_fdb_swtich_dev_notifier_info() fills in the first one, and
then the caller copies that into the second one.

A huge waste.

Please just pass "&info" as an argument.



[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [AoE Tools]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]

  Powered by Linux