Re: [PATCH v1] bridge: Switch to bitmap_zalloc()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] bridge: Switch to bitmap_zalloc()
From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2018 23:13:28 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, bridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20180830103318.60804-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
References: <20180830103318.60804-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>

From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 13:33:18 +0300

> Switch to bitmap_zalloc() to show clearly what we are allocating.
> Besides that it returns pointer of bitmap type instead of opaque void *.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Applied to net-next, thanks.

References:
- [PATCH v1] bridge: Switch to bitmap_zalloc()
  - From: Andy Shevchenko

Prev by Date: [PATCH v1] bridge: Switch to bitmap_zalloc()
Next by Date: [PATCH net-next] net: bridge: add support for sticky fdb entries
Previous by thread: [PATCH v1] bridge: Switch to bitmap_zalloc()
Next by thread: [PATCH net-next] net: bridge: add support for sticky fdb entries
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Netdev] [AoE Tools] [Linux Wireless] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Linux for Hams] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux RAID] [Linux Admin] [Samba] [Video 4 Linux]

Powered by Linux