Re: [PATCH net-next 1/7] net: bridge: Extract boilerplate around switchdev_port_obj_*()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Petr,

Petr Machata <petrm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> -static int __vlan_vid_add(struct net_device *dev, struct net_bridge *br,
> -			  u16 vid, u16 flags)
> +static int br_switchdev_port_obj_add(struct net_device *dev, u16 vid, u16 flags)
>  {
>  	struct switchdev_obj_port_vlan v = {
>  		.obj.orig_dev = dev,
> @@ -89,12 +88,29 @@ static int __vlan_vid_add(struct net_device *dev, struct net_bridge *br,
>  		.vid_begin = vid,
>  		.vid_end = vid,
>  	};
> -	int err;
>  
> +	return switchdev_port_obj_add(dev, &v.obj);
> +}
> +
> +static int br_switchdev_port_obj_del(struct net_device *dev, u16 vid)
> +{
> +	struct switchdev_obj_port_vlan v = {
> +		.obj.orig_dev = dev,
> +		.obj.id = SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_PORT_VLAN,
> +		.vid_begin = vid,
> +		.vid_end = vid,
> +	};
> +
> +	return switchdev_port_obj_del(dev, &v.obj);
> +}

Shouldn't they be br_switchdev_port_vlan_add (or similar) implemented in
net/bridge/br_switchdev.c instead, since they are VLAN specific?

Other than that, the change looks good!

Thanks,

        Vivien



[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [AoE Tools]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]

  Powered by Linux