Re: Problem with syslog in bridge(?) with ethernet broadcast packets with QinQ

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Stephen,

thanks for your response.

I managed to move forward removing the bridge from my schema. I think
the problem has to deal with multicast IPv6 addresses with QinQ in a
bridge.

If I remove that bridge and put the traffic through a vlan type
subinterface in the physical interface, everything seems to work fine
(and the syslog entry, no longer appears...).

I'll try to follow your suggestion and get that trace....

Thanks!
Regards,
Andres


On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 4:58 PM, Stephen Hemminger
<stephen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Sep 2017 17:21:11 +0200
> Andrés Pozo Muñoz <andres.pozom@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm facing some problem with ethernet multicast traffic and QinQ
>> (802.3q in both tags) in -apparently- a bridge in Ubuntu 16.04
>> (4.12.0-041200-generic).
>>
>> My set up is the following:
>> +-----------+
>> |     VM    |
>> +-----+-----+
>>       |
>>       | tag 55
>> +---------+------------+
>> |        OVS           |
>> +-----------+----------+
>>                 | veth3.9
>> veth3   +  |
>>      +--+
>>      | veth2
>> +-------+----------+
>> |       BRIDGE     |
>> +-------+----------+
>>      |
>>      |
>> +-------+----------+
>> |      ens11f1     |
>> +------------------+
>>
>>
>> I am setting the inner tag with OVS and the outer tag with a vlan type veth.
>> The problem I have is that every packet sent from the VM to Ethernet
>> broadcast addresses (33:33:xx:xx:xx:xx) generates a "IPv6 header not
>> found" entry in syslog.
>>
>> If I generate a 'ens11f1.9' interface and remove the BRIDGE, the log
>> entry dissapears.
>>
>> Some questions:
>> * Is there any problem with these packets (ethernet multicast with
>> QinQ) in bridges?
>> * Is there any configuration I should change for the problem to dissapear?
>>
>> Thanks in advance for your help! Any hint about what could be
>> generating those logs is appreciated.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Andrés Pozo
>
> Where is the log message coming from? Could you change the printk into
> a WARN_ON_ONCE and get backtrace? My guess is the firewall code doesn't
> understand the additional tag.




[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [AoE Tools]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]

  Powered by Linux