On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 3:52 PM, David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2017 22:12:31 -0700 > >> BR_ARP_PROXY flag but has a few semantic differences to conform > > This should be "BR_PROXYARP". ack, will fix. > > Otherwise this series looks fine to me, but I see there will be > a v5 respin. yes, working on v5. I am currently testing a few more cases for locally generated arp/nd packets with bridge as the src dev (related to some questions from Toshiaki). Thanks!.
