On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 12:25 AM, Ivan Vecera <cera@xxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]
> @@ -197,13 +191,14 @@ static void br_stp_stop(struct net_bridge *br)
> br_err(br, "failed to stop userspace STP (%d)\n", err);
>
> /* To start timers on any ports left in blocking */
> - mod_timer(&br->hello_timer, jiffies + br->hello_time);
> - list_for_each_entry(p, &br->port_list, list)
> - mod_timer(&p->hold_timer,
> - round_jiffies(jiffies + BR_HOLD_TIME));
> spin_lock_bh(&br->lock);
> br_port_state_selection(br);
> spin_unlock_bh(&br->lock);
> + } else {
> + /* BR_KERNEL_STP - stop hello and hold timers */
> + del_timer(&br->hello_timer);
> + list_for_each_entry(p, &br->port_list, list)
> + del_timer(&p->hold_timer);
> }
>
> br->stp_enabled = BR_NO_STP;
I have a question here, br->stp_enabled is not atomic, and it is being
changed without holding br->lock here, while it may be checked in
br_hello_timer_expired, is it safe ?
(sorry if I misunderstood or overthought about it)
> --
> 2.13.0
>
