On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 08:02:22AM +0200, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote: > On 31/08/16 03:37, Linus Lüssing wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 05:23:08PM +0200, Nikolay Aleksandrov via Bridge wrote: > >> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_if.c b/net/bridge/br_if.c > >> index 1da3221845f1..ed0dd3340084 100644 > >> --- a/net/bridge/br_if.c > >> +++ b/net/bridge/br_if.c > >> @@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ static struct net_bridge_port *new_nbp(struct net_bridge *br, > >> p->path_cost = port_cost(dev); > >> p->priority = 0x8000 >> BR_PORT_BITS; > >> p->port_no = index; > >> - p->flags = BR_LEARNING | BR_FLOOD; > >> + p->flags = BR_LEARNING | BR_FLOOD | BR_MCAST_FLOOD; > > > > I'm discontent with this new flag becoming the default. > > > > Could you elaborate a little more on your use-case, when/why do > > you want/need this flag? > > > > The use case is the current default behaviour if we don't make this flag on by default > then we'll change user-visible default behaviour. Right now we flood unregistered mcast > traffic by default (if there's no querier and router port, which continues to function > as before). Also we have the port flags equal to BR_AUTO_MASK by default. Ok, you're right, the way you implemented it doesn't change the default behaviour (ignoring the BR_AUTO_MASK change you removed in v3). I guess the "similar to the unknown unicast flood flag" confused me a little and I was afraid that the "flood if there is no listener / MDB entry" behaviour, which was removed some years ago, would be reintroduced. (but yeah, looking at the code more closely, it doesn't do that) Thanks for the clarification! Regards, Linus
