Re: [PATCH net-next v2] bridge: Synchronize unicast filtering with FDB

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 16/06/12 (日) 1:17, Nikolay Aleksandrov via Bridge wrote:
On 06/11/2016 07:35 AM, David Miller wrote:
From: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon,  6 Jun 2016 21:20:13 +0900

Patrick Schaaf reported that flooding due to a missing fdb entry of
the address of macvlan on the bridge device caused high CPU
consumption of an openvpn process behind a tap bridge port.
Adding an fdb entry of the macvlan address can suppress flooding
and avoid this problem.

This change makes bridge able to synchronize unicast filtering with
fdb automatically so admin do not need to manually add an fdb entry.
This effectively supports IFF_UNICAST_FLT in bridge, thus adding an
macvlan device would not place bridge into promiscuous mode as well.

v2:
- Test vlan with br_vlan_should_use() in br_fdb_sync_uc() as per
   Nikolay Aleksandrov.

Reported-by: Patrick Schaaf <netdev@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

I really need bridging experts to review and ACK/NACK this.

Thanks.


Oops, I almost missed the v2, sorry about that. So, technically it looks correct, but
I only fear the scalability impact of the change. If there're a large number of vlans
adding a macvlan (or any device that syncs uc addr) might become very slow and every
flag change will become very slow too without an option to revert to the original
behaviour so we'll have to wait for the entries to be added in order to delete them.
Another common scenario is having 8021q interfaces on top of the bridge with different
mac addresses for some of the configured vlans (or with macvlans on top of them for VRR),
that use case would suffer as well because their macs need to be local only for those vlans,
and not the 2000+ other vlans that might exist.
On every sync_uc() call all the fdb entries get deleted and added again, so even after deleting
some manually they can come back unexpectedly after some operation and also the message storm from
all the deletes and adds could be problematic as well.

E.g. 2000 br0 vlans, 25 macvlans on br0 (adding them took more than 5 minutes, 53k fdb entries):
$ bridge fdb del de:8e:9f:16:c5:71 dev br0 vlan 289
$ ip l set br0 multicast on
$ bridge fdb | grep 289 | grep de:8e:9f:16:c5:71
de:8e:9f:16:c5:71 dev br0 vlan 1289 master br0 permanent
de:8e:9f:16:c5:71 dev br0 vlan 289 master br0 permanent

In fact you can't escape the slow performance even if you delete all entries because on the
next flag change or interface add, they will be added back.

I still think this auto-sync should be done, otherwise macvlan imposes promiscuous mode on bridge even if you manually add such fdb entries. I believe most of your concern would disappear by making use of __dev_uc_sync() instead. Indeed it seems that there is no easy way to propagate the combination of uc addr and vlan from upper device, so local entries for unneeded vlan can still be created even if using __dev_uc_sync(). In case you worry about those unneeded entries, I can add a knob to disable this feature.
Are you comfortable with this change?

Toshiaki Makita



[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [AoE Tools]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]

  Powered by Linux