On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 4:10 AM, David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 14:08:13 +0900
>
>> On 2016/04/05 12:32, Xin Long wrote:
>>> There are some repetitive codes in stp_state_store, we can remove
>>> them by calling store_bridge_parm.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> net/bridge/br_sysfs_br.c | 24 +++++++-----------------
>>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_sysfs_br.c b/net/bridge/br_sysfs_br.c
>>> index 137cd3b..9918763 100644
>>> --- a/net/bridge/br_sysfs_br.c
>>> +++ b/net/bridge/br_sysfs_br.c
>>> @@ -128,27 +128,17 @@ static ssize_t stp_state_show(struct device *d,
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>> +static int set_stp_state(struct net_bridge *br, unsigned long val)
>>> +{
>>
>> You forgot to add rtnl lock here?
>> The missing lock is restored in patch 4, but at this point bisect could
>> break..
OK, if I will fix this, if there's no other issues on this patchset,
I will post v3 later.
Thanks.
>
> Agreed, this has to be fixed.
