On Tue, 4 Aug 2015 19:06:31 +0200 Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Hi, > When IFLA_BRPORT_PROXYARP and PROXYARP_WIFI were introduced they weren't > accounted for in the get_slave_size() callback and didn't get a policy > entry, so fix it now. Sending as two separate patches because the first > one goes further back than the second and thus we get 2 different Fixes > tags. > > Cheers, > Nik > > Nikolay Aleksandrov (2): > bridge: netlink: account for the IFLA_BRPORT_PROXYARP attribute size > and policy > bridge: netlink: account for the IFLA_BRPORT_PROXYARP_WIFI attribute > size and policy > > net/bridge/br_netlink.c | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > Acked-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
