When bridge device is created with IFLA_ADDRESS, we are not calling
br_stp_change_bridge_id(), which leads to incorrect local fdb
management and bridge id calculation, and prevents us from receiving
frames on the bridge device.
Reported-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
v1->v2:
- Remove variable "err" and directly return register_netdevice().
net/bridge/br_netlink.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_netlink.c b/net/bridge/br_netlink.c
index e74b6d53..e8844d9 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_netlink.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_netlink.c
@@ -445,6 +445,20 @@ static int br_validate(struct nlattr *tb[], struct nlattr *data[])
return 0;
}
+static int br_dev_newlink(struct net *src_net, struct net_device *dev,
+ struct nlattr *tb[], struct nlattr *data[])
+{
+ struct net_bridge *br = netdev_priv(dev);
+
+ if (tb[IFLA_ADDRESS]) {
+ spin_lock_bh(&br->lock);
+ br_stp_change_bridge_id(br, nla_data(tb[IFLA_ADDRESS]));
+ spin_unlock_bh(&br->lock);
+ }
+
+ return register_netdevice(dev);
+}
+
static size_t br_get_link_af_size(const struct net_device *dev)
{
struct net_port_vlans *pv;
@@ -473,6 +487,7 @@ struct rtnl_link_ops br_link_ops __read_mostly = {
.priv_size = sizeof(struct net_bridge),
.setup = br_dev_setup,
.validate = br_validate,
+ .newlink = br_dev_newlink,
.dellink = br_dev_delete,
};
--
1.8.1.2
