Re: [PATCHv4 net-next 2/2] bridge: Add a flag to control unicast packet flood.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 net-next 2/2] bridge: Add a flag to control unicast packet flood.
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 12:41:46 -0700
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, bridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mst@xxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: bridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1367345928-31135-3-git-send-email-vyasevic@redhat.com>
References: <1367345928-31135-1-git-send-email-vyasevic@redhat.com> <1367345928-31135-3-git-send-email-vyasevic@redhat.com>

On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 14:18:47 -0400
Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> +	IFLA_BRPORT_UNICAST_FLOOD,	/* control flood of unicast traffic */

Minor nit, comment could be just
  /* flood unicast traffic */
and the comments for other flags line up, so why not make these line up?

References:
- [PATCHv4 net-next 0/2] Add two new flags to bridge.
  - From: Vlad Yasevich
- [PATCHv4 net-next 2/2] bridge: Add a flag to control unicast packet flood.
  - From: Vlad Yasevich

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCHv4 net-next 0/2] Add two new flags to bridge.
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 0/6] Allow bridge to function in non-promisc mode
Previous by thread: [PATCHv4 net-next 2/2] bridge: Add a flag to control unicast packet flood.
Next by thread: [PATCHv4 net-next 0/2] Add two new flags to bridge.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Netdev] [AoE Tools] [Linux Wireless] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Linux for Hams] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux RAID] [Linux Admin] [Samba] [Video 4 Linux]

Powered by Linux