Re: [PATCH net-next 2/4] bridge: Allow an ability to designate an uplink port

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 22:33:33 +0200
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 09:45:24PM -0400, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
> > Allow a ports to be designated as uplink.  Multiple ports
> > may be designated as uplinks and they will be kept in a
> > list.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> It looks like if you make two links uplink, bridging
> between them won't work at all?

Maybe better to mark which ports are terminal ports rather than marking
uplink ports?


[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [AoE Tools]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]

  Powered by Linux