Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] Allow bridge to function in non-promisc mode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 08:12:29 -0400
Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 03/13/2013 02:22 AM, "Oleg A. Arkhangelsky" wrote:
> >
> >
> > 13.03.2013, 05:45, "Vlad Yasevich" <vyasevic@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> >
> >> The series adds an ability for the bridge to function in non-promiscuous mode.
> >
> > What is the practical applications for such setup? In other words,
> > in which cases I would want to put bridge into non-promiscuous
> > mode and specify some uplink ports?
> >
> 
> On of the applications would be when bridge is an edge device servicing 
> a VM deployment.  Each of the VMs knows the mac address that the guest
> has and may program that mac onto the uplinks.

Why wouldn't that environment just use macvlan?
Is it because changing libvirt is harder than changing the kernel?


[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [AoE Tools]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]

  Powered by Linux