Re: [PATCH -next] bridge: using for_each_set_bit to simplify the code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: weiyj.lk@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] bridge: using for_each_set_bit to simplify the code
From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 08:15:51 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: stephen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, yongjun_wei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, bridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: bridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CAPgLHd_viA9nTBMRhhE-XJzYHu8a7f5Xjve9hYpU-RaY=uE9+g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPgLHd_viA9nTBMRhhE-XJzYHu8a7f5Xjve9hYpU-RaY=uE9+g@mail.gmail.com>

From: Wei Yongjun <weiyj.lk@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 23:45:23 +0800

> From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Using for_each_set_bit() to simplify the code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Applied.

References:
- [PATCH -next] bridge: using for_each_set_bit to simplify the code
  - From: Wei Yongjun

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH -next] bridge: using for_each_set_bit_from to simplify the code
Next by Date: [PATCH net-next 0/4] Allow bridge to function in non-promisc mode
Previous by thread: [PATCH -next] bridge: using for_each_set_bit to simplify the code
Next by thread: [PATCH] bridge: netfilter: use PTR_RET instead of IS_ERR + PTR_ERR
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Netdev] [AoE Tools] [Linux Wireless] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Linux for Hams] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux RAID] [Linux Admin] [Samba] [Video 4 Linux]

Powered by Linux