On Sun, 04 Nov 2012, David Miller wrote: > From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 23:02:30 +0100 > > > Instead of issuing (0) statements when !CONFIG_SYSFS which will cause > > 'warning: ', we'll use inline statements instead. This will effectively > > do the same thing, but suppress any unnecessary warnings. > > > > Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: bridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Applied, but please use more informative subject lines. > > You should prefix your subject line after [PATCH ...] with > the name of the subsystem you are touching, a ": " then > the headline description. > > So here you would have used "bridge: " and that's what I added when I > commited this patch. Yes, of course I should have done, and usually do. This was an oversight, sorry about that. -- Lee Jones Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog