Le 13/08/2012 19:31, Jiri Pirko a écrit :
Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 07:04:11PM CEST, bhutchings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
+struct netdev_upper {
+ struct net_device *dev;
+ bool unique;
This needs a better name. It doesn't really have anything to do with
uniqueness and doesn't ensure exclusivity. I think that it would be
fine to keep the 'master' term.
Hmm. I admit that "unique" I do not like too much as well. But "master"
I like even less.
This flag should ensure exclusivity. Only one upper device with this
flag can be present at a time.
Well, can't we simply call it "upper_device"?
And as we only have a single field, this is exclusive by design.
Nicolas.
