Use the new bool function ether_addr_equal to add some clarity and reduce the likelihood for misuse of compare_ether_addr for sorting. Done via cocci script: $ cat compare_ether_addr.cocci @@ expression a,b; @@ - !compare_ether_addr(a, b) + ether_addr_equal(a, b) @@ expression a,b; @@ - compare_ether_addr(a, b) + !ether_addr_equal(a, b) @@ expression a,b; @@ - !ether_addr_equal(a, b) == 0 + ether_addr_equal(a, b) @@ expression a,b; @@ - !ether_addr_equal(a, b) != 0 + !ether_addr_equal(a, b) @@ expression a,b; @@ - ether_addr_equal(a, b) == 0 + !ether_addr_equal(a, b) @@ expression a,b; @@ - ether_addr_equal(a, b) != 0 + ether_addr_equal(a, b) @@ expression a,b; @@ - !!ether_addr_equal(a, b) + ether_addr_equal(a, b) Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- net/bridge/netfilter/ebt_stp.c | 4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/bridge/netfilter/ebt_stp.c b/net/bridge/netfilter/ebt_stp.c index 5b33a2e..071d872 100644 --- a/net/bridge/netfilter/ebt_stp.c +++ b/net/bridge/netfilter/ebt_stp.c @@ -164,8 +164,8 @@ static int ebt_stp_mt_check(const struct xt_mtchk_param *par) !(info->bitmask & EBT_STP_MASK)) return -EINVAL; /* Make sure the match only receives stp frames */ - if (compare_ether_addr(e->destmac, bridge_ula) || - compare_ether_addr(e->destmsk, msk) || !(e->bitmask & EBT_DESTMAC)) + if (!ether_addr_equal(e->destmac, bridge_ula) || + !ether_addr_equal(e->destmsk, msk) || !(e->bitmask & EBT_DESTMAC)) return -EINVAL; return 0; -- 1.7.8.111.gad25c.dirty _______________________________________________ Bridge mailing list Bridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge
