On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 12:01 AM, Sasikanth V <sasikanth.v19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Since I am new to patch states and workflow. Can you guys please let me, what I have to do when the Thanks for looking at the patch. I made 5 set functions (set_forward_delay, set_max_age,On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 9:25 PM, Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 20:19:57 +0530I will clean this up. There are things like introducing
Sasikanth V <sasikanth.v19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Sasikanth V <sasikanth.v19@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
global function names (set_forward_delay, etc) that need
to be fixed.
set_hello_time, set_priority and set_ageing_time) in br_sysfs_br.c global to use in br_ioctl.c to
avoid code duplication (but it looks it is not a good idea).
Now i thought something like making those 5 functions static inline and moving it to br_private.h.
If this is fine , I will resend the patch
patch state is in Awaiting Stream.
Thanks
_______________________________________________ Bridge mailing list Bridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge