On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 15:18:15 +0000 Rus Foster <twattycake@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > We've got an issue with some Xen guests and not forwarding packets on > the bridge for some interfaces but not all others > > The main server is 109.169.72.130. > > The bridge is eth0 (with peth0) > > The IP 109.169.72.249 assigned to vifvm6039.0 works > > The IP 109.169.72.251 assigned to vifvm5927.0 doesn't > > > [root@8 tmp]# brctl show > bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces > eth0 8000.0025901d7134 yes vifvm5955.0 > tap46.0 > vifvm5911.0 > tap45.0 > vifvm5927.0 > vifvm5912.0 > tap43.0 > vifvm5967.0 > tap40.0 > vifvm5913.0 > vifvm6043.0 > vifvm6032.0 > vifvm6021.0 > vifvm5953.0 > vifvm5907.0 > vifvm5954.0 > tap11.0 > vifvm6039.0 > vifvm6038.0 > tap4.0 > vifvm5919.0 > tap3.0 > vifvm5915.0 > peth0 > > > [root@8 tmp]# brctl showmacs eth0 > port no mac addr is local? ageing timer > 1 00:0d:29:43:df:ae no 0.18 > 14 00:16:3e:0f:9b:6c no 0.53 > 16 00:16:3e:14:26:36 no 24.73 > 7 00:16:3e:1d:7e:40 no 104.61 > 5 00:16:3e:37:62:9f no 55.77 > 18 00:16:3e:47:27:f9 no 102.34 > 12 00:16:3e:70:56:f2 no 103.13 > 17 00:16:3e:75:4a:a5 no 101.74 > 19 00:16:3e:75:f4:b1 no 40.01 > 23 00:16:3e:76:f7:4d no 33.89 > 13 00:16:3e:79:84:cb no 105.13 > 15 00:16:3e:7a:59:ac no 26.46 > 2 00:16:3e:8d:1e:4d no 0.20 > 8 00:16:3e:96:47:c6 no 105.13 > 10 00:16:3e:9f:3a:69 no 14.17 > 21 00:16:3e:bc:c6:46 no 102.14 > 9 00:16:3e:f2:03:05 no 11.45 > 1 00:23:9c:12:a1:80 no 0.00 > 1 00:25:90:1d:71:34 yes 0.00 > 23 3a:48:46:fa:0f:f3 yes 0.00 > 2 62:7b:18:61:a1:f7 yes 0.00 > 21 66:c2:21:04:72:26 yes 0.00 > 19 7a:8b:f3:51:81:f4 yes 0.00 > 10 a6:7f:67:8e:e5:45 yes 0.00 > 5 c2:2d:30:b5:8e:44 yes 0.00 > 7 ca:a1:4b:0f:7d:c9 yes 0.00 > 13 fe:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff yes 0.00 > > root@8 tmp]# uname -a > Linux 8.xn.nj.damnvps.com 2.6.18-243.el5xen #1 SMP Mon Feb 7 19:07:01 > EST 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > [root@8 tmp]# cat /etc/redhat-release > CentOS release 5.5 (Final) > > > From the server 109.169.72.249 and 109.169.72.251 can be pinged > > From externally only 109.169.72.249 can be > > There are NO iptables, ebtables rules > > Default gateway is defined correctly in each guests. If we reboot the > server then differenet interfaces work/don't work so its not a VM > configuration issue > > I'm totally out of ideas so thinking it might be a bug > > Feedback gratefully received pseudo ethernet doesn't do promicious correctly? you should use eth0 not peth0. What is output of brctl showstp br0? -- _______________________________________________ Bridge mailing list Bridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge
