Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thursday 19 November 2009, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >>> It seems that we should never drop dst then. We either forward the frame to >>> netif_rx or to dev_queue_xmit, and from how I read it now, we want to keep >>> the dst in both cases. >> When we loop back on our selves we certainly need to have dst clear because >> we don't know how to cache routes through multiple network namespaces. > > Ah, right. So should I add the explicit dst_drop to the new dev_forward_skb() > then? The veth driver doesn't need it, but it also looks like it won't hurt. Yes, I think that should be fine. _______________________________________________ Bridge mailing list Bridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge
